Elizabeth. (1985)patibility within the mother-infant dating: Origins and processes

Mutton, M. Age., & Gilbride, K. Inside the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you can in conflict dating (pp. 33-60). Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]

Lee, L., Loewenstein, G Canadian vakre kvinner., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & More youthful, J. (2008). If I am not hot, are you currently sensuous or not?: Physical-attractiveness recommendations and you may matchmaking needs while the a purpose of an individual’s own attractiveness. Psychological Research, 19, 669677. [ Hyperlinks ]

Levinger, G., & Rands, Yards. (1985)patibility in-marriage or any other close relationships. Inside the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and you may in conflict relationships (pp. 309-331). Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]

Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Level of ambition. Within the J. McV. Have a look (Ed.), Identification while the choices problems (Vol. 1, pp. 333378). Ny: Ronald Drive. [ Backlinks ]

Enjoying, T. J. (2006). Forecasting relationship relationships fate having insiders’ and you may outsiders’ direction: Exactly who and what’s asked issues. Private Matchmaking, 13, 349-362. [ Backlinks ]

Luo, S., & Klohnen, Elizabeth. C. (2005). Assortative mating and relationship top quality inside the newly wedded couples: A couple of oriented strategy. Log out of Personality and you can Societal Mindset, 88, 304-326. [ Backlinks ]

Legitimizing activities about initiation out of heterosexual matchmaking

Lutz-Zois, C. J., Bradley, A great. C., Mihalik, J. L., & Moorman-Eavers, E. R. (2006). Perceived resemblance and relationship achievements certainly relationship partners: An enthusiastic idiographic approach. Record away from Public and personal Matchmaking, 23, 865-880. [ Links ]

Madden, Yards., & Lenhart, An effective. (2006). Matchmaking. Arizona, DC: Statement towards Pew Websites & American Existence Opportunity. Recovered , off [ Links ]

MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, Yards. (1999). Evaluating the accuracy away from forecasts throughout the matchmaking relationships: Just how and why carry out lovers’ forecasts range from those individuals created by observers? Identity and you may Public Psychology Bulletin, twenty-five, 14171429. [ Hyperlinks ]

The new appeal-resemblance hypothesis among mix-intercourse nearest and dearest: Relationships satisfaction, imagined similarities, and care about-offering thinking

ater, J., & Smith, S. (1982). Paper shown on Earliest Around the world Appointment towards the Private Matchmaking, Madison, WI. [ Links ]

Merkle, Age.Roentgen., & Richardson, R.A good. (2000). Electronic relationship and you will digital associated: Conceptualizing desktop mediated intimate relationship. Family, forty two, 187-192. [ Backlinks ]

Montoya, Roentgen. Yards., Horton, R. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Is actually genuine similarity necessary for interest? A good meta-study away from real and you can imagined resemblance. Diary of Social and private Matchmaking, twenty five, 889-922. [ Hyperlinks ]

Morry, M. M. (2005). Relationship fulfillment since the a predictor off similarity studies; A test of destination-similarity theory. Log of Social and personal Dating, 22, 561-584. [ Hyperlinks ]

Murstein, B. We. (1987). An explanation and you will extension of your own SVR principle of dyadic combining. Journal off ily, forty two, 929-947. [ Hyperlinks ]

Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J. Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). Who will split up: A good fourteen-seasons longitudinal examination of black couples and you can white partners. Diary from Social and private Matchmaking, 19, 179-202. [ Website links ]

Orenstein, S. (). The new love formula Suits thinks it has got discovered an algorithm to have governing the web based dating organization: A technical strategy for finding Mr. otherwise Ms. Proper. Team 2.0 Mag. Recovered on the out of [ Website links ]

Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Precisely the congruent survive – Identity similarities in the people. Personality and you can Individual Variations, forty five, 533-535. [ Backlinks ]

Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, S., & Cate, R. (2000). Lover preferences: What functions would anyone attract inside their short-identity intimate and long-identity close people? Diary away from Therapy and you can Human Sex, several, 1-21. [ Website links ]

Reis, H. T. (1985). The fresh new part of one’s worry about on initiation and you will course of personal telecommunications. Inside the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and you may in conflict relationship (pp. 209-231). Nyc: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]

Marketing Digital. Este proyecto ha sido desarrollado por Grupo Enfoca: Diseño web Alicante