Table step three shows brand new descriptive statistics of your own ECP, and you may considers the connection position and intercourse of users

New Confirmatory Basis Analysis of your own Individual Connection Size (ECP) revealed that the original model proposed because of the experts did not enjoys a sufficient fit in the modern test ([chi square] / df = 5.63, GFI = .93, CFI = .86, TLI = .84, RMSEA = .07), particularly in terms of the [chi square] / df, CFI age TLI thinking. During the white of these results and you can considering the details put (Browne Cudeck, 1992; Hu Bentler, 1999; Segars Grover, 1993) i decided to proceed that have an Exploratory Grounds Data.

The significance of the effect of the relationship status on the level of personal commitment of the participants was evaluated by the ANOVA one way method, in which the normality (p <

New Exploratory Grounds Research of the Individual Union Scale (ECP), in the form of Dominating Axis Factoring, shown brand new unidimensional design of the level, as the only the option of among the many portion reached the new minimum Eigenvalue of 1. This was including evident inside the translation of one’s scree-patch chart (Community, 2009).

The precision of one’s aspect is examined from internal structure of one’s scale, in the form of Cronbach’s alpha, as well as the adequacy of every item was also confirmed (Dining table 1). It had been affirmed one to activities 3 and you may 10 don’t fulfill the minimum conditions having inclusion, on the loading to have product ten underneath the worthy of believed appropriate, one another got weakened items-full correlations in addition to elimination of one another issues improved the total value of Cronbach’s leader, with the worth just before treatment getting .80. Inside white regarding the study, the decision was made to eradicate both of these facts about research (; Nunnally Bernstein, 1994). These things coincide just on the several items the writers envision as actually in accordance with the escort review Laredo TX brand new meta-relationship dimension, thus being technically adequate its empirical differentiation throughout the remainder of the items in addition to their different about scale. The last unidimensional framework, without any known points, demonstrates to you % of one’s overall difference, having acceptable items-overall correlations (Community, 2009) between .36 and .60 and with an entire mediocre score of five.56 (DP = .86). The Cronbach alphas vary between .82 on overall decide to try, .83 and .81 respectively toward female and male try. Toward four subgroups, we gotten .82, .80, .70 and .84 respectively getting members for the an online dating dating, matchmaking having cohabitation, specialized partnership and married people. We are able to thus consider every internal consistency indices given that a beneficial (Cronbach, 1970; ).

The average ECP scores in the current sample are as follows, 5.56 (DP = .86) for the total sample, 5.48 (DP = .86) for women and 5.70 (DP = .83) for men. This difference is significant F(1, 922) = ; p < .001; [[eta].sup.2]p = .02.

Continuing with the validation of the Personal Commitment Scale (ECP), we proceeded with the concurrent validity criteria analysis. The global values for personal commitment showed, as expected, significant positive correlations (p < .001) with the total RRF-R (.63) and with all its subscales (Passion, .64; Confidence, .51; Conflicts, .44; Intimacy, .45), which indicate that higher levels of personal commitment correlated with higher indices of relationship quality, in all its dimensions.

A mathematically high effectation of the partnership reputation on the private connection amounts of the participants F(step 3, 920) = 9

Once the described analyses were completed, they were followed by the exploration of the various relationship statuses present in the sample of participants (Table 3) with the results obtained by these in the Portuguese version of the scale thus validated, the ECP. 05 for three of the four types of relationship statuses) and homoscedasticity analyses W(3, 920) = 1.06; p = .298 were sufficiently robust to proceed with the analyses. 59; p < .001; [[eta].sup.2]p = .03 was observed.

Marketing Digital. Este proyecto ha sido desarrollado por Grupo Enfoca: Diseño web Alicante